OPINION
In Hungry Times, Apple Must Avoid Eating Its Partners' Lunch

Apple has always had an uneven relationship with its channel partners, in my experience. On the positive side, Apple's retail stores have led the way, set the example, and created a consistent, international sales focal point for Apple's clear advantage.

On the other hand, there have been occasions when, it seems to me, Apple perceives any money to be made on its products to belong inherently to them in some vague sense. The company works with is channel partners to increase the sales of Apple products, but that hasn't always meant a 110 percent benign relationship.

Staying Competitive

I read today that Apple is now giving its store managers more liberty to match the prices of other authorized retailers. Again, in perspective, that's a good thing because customers will be shopping for bargains this Christmas buying season, and it's not too hard to run over to Costco (Nasdaq: COST) or Micro Center to get a better deal on a coveted iPod gift for Christmas. Apple wants its stores to be at least as competitive as anyone else.

The problem is that some authorized retailers are at the end of the food chain. That creates some typical problems for that kind of scenario. Even so, they'll trade off a bit of profit to get customers into their store. Often, those channel partners sell other things. Costco and Microcenter, for example, sell HDTVs, PCs, cameras, and all kinds of other cool electronic gadgets. They'd like to present those items to a customer who's been invited into their store with an attractive discount price on an iPod. That's a business decision they make to increase overall sales.

Your Partner's Needs

When Apple matches that low price, Apple as a whole still sells the same number of products, but its partners suffer a little, make a little less money, and don't get as much of that coveted foot traffic.

Apple is always doing interesting things -- both to promote sales for its channel partners and, other times, to give them great pause. This looks to me like another case where Apple's unflagging obsession with profit doesn't take into account the business needs of its partners.